About us
Udimi is a Top 1 marketplace to buy or sell email solo ads in the world. To guarantee the best traffic quality to buyers and fast payments to sellers, we stand between parties and control every step of the process.
Udimi is a registered trademark of Udimicom, Limited. Ifigeneias 14, 3036, Limassol, Cyprus
Secure payment methods
App rating 4.8 • 10,000+ users
Suggestion: BASE FILTERS Revisted
Uncle D,
I kindly ask that you reevaluate the BASE FILTERS. In particular their default ON status and also the Javascript analysis. Sellers are loosing TOO MANY good clicks to it.
Here is the influential Krebs on Security talking about disabling Javascript and only allowing it for selected sites.
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2011/05/blocking-javascript-in-the-browser/
"But disallowing JavaScript by default and selectively enabling it for specific sites remains a much safer option than letting all sites run JavaScript unrestricted all the time."
It is clear from the article security conscious people are being told to turn off Javascript and I think it is time we start to recognize it and not treat it as an outright BOT. On first pass on a squeeze page these people are not going turn it on. On second pass they would then be labeled a DUPE click.
By the way people building bots today use FREE headless browsers with full Javascript support like http://phantomjs.org
Anyway, bottom line I kindly ask that you please reevaluate this.
Thanks, Heather
Uncle D,
I kindly ask that you reevaluate the BASE FILTERS. In particular their default ON status and also the Javascript analysis. Sellers are loosing TOO MANY good clicks to it.
Here is the influential Krebs on Security talking about disabling Javascript and only allowing it for selected sites.
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2011/05/blocking-javascript-in-the-browser/
"But disallowing JavaScript by default and selectively enabling it for specific sites remains a much safer option than letting all sites run JavaScript unrestricted all the time."
It is clear from the article security conscious people are being told to turn off Javascript and I think it is time we start to recognize it and not treat it as an outright BOT. On first pass on a squeeze page these people are not going turn it on. On second pass they would then be labeled a DUPE click.
By the way people building bots today use FREE headless browsers with full Javascript support like http://phantomjs.org
Anyway, bottom line I kindly ask that you please reevaluate this.
Thanks, Heather
See attach
i totally agree maybe support team should check this out
i totally agree maybe support team should check this out
See attach
i agree this new BASE FILTERS has caused a solo of sellers issue and udimi support needs to check this out
i agree this new BASE FILTERS has caused a solo of sellers issue and udimi support needs to check this out
@Heather Alessandra I agree with you :)
@Heather Alessandra I agree with you :)
See attach
See attach
See attach
What is the source of this and when it refers to "enhancements" specifically what are those?
What is the source of this and when it refers to "enhancements" specifically what are those?
https://gds.blog.gov.uk
Javascript is an enhancement. That number represents internet users with Javascript ON.
https://gds.blog.gov.uk
Javascript is an enhancement. That number represents internet users with Javascript ON.
Why are sellers allowed to charge for what should be basic filters. I misunderstood the meaning, and and bought before and after. And poor Liz got the wrong idea about me and what I thought. This needs to go back to the way it was.
Why are sellers allowed to charge for what should be basic filters. I misunderstood the meaning, and and bought before and after. And poor Liz got the wrong idea about me and what I thought. This needs to go back to the way it was.
See attach
basic filters are free
basic filters are free
See attach
Ok, I found the study
https://gds.blog.gov.uk/2013/10/21/how-many-people-are-missing-out-on-javascript-enhancement/
It's based on traffic to UK gov site. Where they did a hack to try and figure it out.
Here is a better study done by Yahoo in 2010 that found over 2% in the USA do not have Javascript enabled.
https://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/many-users-javascript-disabled-14121.html
So based on the Yahoo study alone if I ran a 500 click solo that would be 10 GOOD CLICKS not being counted.
But I think it is actually higher then 2 percent as there are just many more security conscious people out there today.
Ok, I found the study
https://gds.blog.gov.uk/2013/10/21/how-many-people-are-missing-out-on-javascript-enhancement/
It's based on traffic to UK gov site. Where they did a hack to try and figure it out.
Here is a better study done by Yahoo in 2010 that found over 2% in the USA do not have Javascript enabled.
https://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/many-users-javascript-disabled-14121.html
So based on the Yahoo study alone if I ran a 500 click solo that would be 10 GOOD CLICKS not being counted.
But I think it is actually higher then 2 percent as there are just many more security conscious people out there today.
See attach
i agree
i agree