Mark Haydin's negative comment was "Not many optins, 300 clicks with 20 optins".
I can't force my subscribers to optin. So how will I fulfill his requirement??
I contacted with Mark Haydin and requested to remove the negative rating. He replied: "Yes, because I know how my squeeze page should perform and 20 opt ins of 300 clicks is very very poor, I am only being honest with what you gave me, I guess if you give me some free clicks to make up for my loss, I will leave positive feedback, it depends on how good your customer service is and if you can be bothered helping me. If you gave me a good service I will leave positive feedback, how can we both benefit and fix this? no need to get angry, I am also new at this website."
Can anyone suggest me what to do?
I'm inclined to agree with Yorke here. Since the filters in place at Udimi filter out clicks that 'dont' make the grade' for whatever reason, then it's usually reasonable to assume that the clicks that are counted are 'good clicks'. So with that in mind, if a solo is fulfilled within the time period
What if the seller sends traffic from a porn site, when you ordered Forex traffic? All these clicks will pass the filter, since they all are real, but this kind of traffic deserves negative rating.
Udimi Team,all sellers should be sending traffic from their lists, NOT from a website of any description, so that's an invalid point is it not? The clicks may be real but the method of sending the traffic is not from a list, which is the whole point of buying a solo in the first place. Anyone sending traffic from a website should not be selling solos to any buyer and I would hope Udimi Team WOULD NOT allow it either. Best, Dean.
Udimi Team,all sellers should be sending traffic from their lists, NOT from a website of any description, so that's an invalid point is it not? The clicks may be real but the method of sending the traffic is not from a list, which is the whole point of buying a solo in the first place. Anyone sendin
yes, but porn site's list is still a list
Udimi Team,all sellers should be sending traffic from their lists, NOT from a website of any description, so that's an invalid point is it not? The clicks may be real but the method of sending the traffic is not from a list, which is the whole point of buying a solo in the first place. Anyone sendin
all seller here should be sending from there list
yes, but porn site's list is still a list
most of us have make money list or diet list
Liz, I know that! Udimi Team was referring to traffic sent from a WEBSITE. See above ^^^
Udimi Team - that wasn't what you originally said.You referred to traffic sent from a website, which isn't what a solo is. Also, that example is rather extreme don't you think. How many vendors send porn traffic from a website to a forex buyer. Really? Come on. If we are going to have examples, let's make them something that happens on a regular basis. If there are people sending traffic like this on Udimi, then they shouldn't be on Udimi. Period.
Liz, I know that! Udimi Team was referring to traffic sent from a WEBSITE. See above ^^^ Udimi Team - that wasn't what you originally said.You referred to traffic sent from a website, which isn't what a solo is. Also, that example is rather extreme don't you think. How many vendors send porn traffic
you won't believe how many people we ban each month for this kind of tricks....
you won't believe how many people we ban each month for this kind of tricks....
just few minutes ago banned one!
Liz, I know that! Udimi Team was referring to traffic sent from a WEBSITE. See above ^^^ Udimi Team - that wasn't what you originally said.You referred to traffic sent from a website, which isn't what a solo is. Also, that example is rather extreme don't you think. How many vendors send porn traffic
before I started this site I was thinking I was an expert, but I was actually clueless how many scams are actually all over there: __both__ buyers and sellers. There's far, far more scams than you think there is...
In wild market 90% is a scam. Fake clicks and identities, stolen credit cards and fake paypal accounts.
Your "rather extreme" examples are our everyday examples. Some idiots even try to blackmail us after ban. And we have to deal with all these idiots every day.
Best, Uncle Dimitry.
So on this if someone gets great optins and then cause of some new filter they have in place ie time on site stats my traffic must now be a scam is that it??? Cause it seems to be on what is being said here which I find offensive actually... Rick Ling
What do you do buyer link is not working and you refund him for good custumer services you get charged
Further to this would love to know when the UDIMI track filter classes a click as bad why other than it just is seen it say it's bot or datacenter/hosting click what's that and where does it get that data from is it an own UDIMI filter or thru an external tracking system just wondered that's all. Plus some here have said that the same click IP after been classified as a bad click and useless as classified to buyers yet has brought a sale to a buyer how so if a bad click just wondered.... Rick Ling
So to continue my debate from other thread... with this thread... -------- Ok Uncle so on the next part of my 'time on site' debate do you think a negative rating(I don't think deserved a negative) is warranted regardless of the site quality I mean as you can see alot even leave ASAP quick on a good reasonable offer site but still high tail it quick hmm.... Maybe on negative ratings should be more of an option to rate sellers like a system if [points equal under 7/10 then is a negative(time on site, optins, sales(only if have in funnel) etc... hmm...anyway I think was unfair.. got my second bad rating in 3 years is it cause of that assumption.... --------