I just thought about how the tier 1 rate evolved over the years. I remember times a few years ago when non 100% tier 1 orders had like 70% tier 1. Nowadays people are sending like 90%+ tier 1 on those orders. To be honest with this tier 1 rate it isn't really an incentive for buyers to purchase 100% tier 1, as they receive 90%+ anyways.
So my suggestion would be to set a maximum tier 1 percentage of 80% on non 100% tier 1 orders. Everything above 80% should get filtered.
This gives buyers actually an incentive to buy 100% tier 1.
What do you guys think?
Hi all,
I just thought about how the tier 1 rate evolved over the years. I remember times a few years ago when non 100% tier 1 orders had like 70% tier 1. Nowadays people are sending like 90%+ tier 1 on those orders. To be honest with this tier 1 rate it isn't really an incentive for buyers to purchase 100% tier 1, as they receive 90%+ anyways.
So my suggestion would be to set a maximum tier 1 percentage of 80% on non 100% tier 1 orders. Everything above 80% should get filtered.
This gives buyers actually an incentive to buy 100% tier 1.
I would not filter. Some of us use only use tier 1 data to build our list. It cost a premium so that would not be fair...that said...you should not be able to sell the based item as 100% T1...if someone want wants 100% T1 they should pay Udimi’s premium.
I would not filter. Some of us use only use tier 1 data to build our list. It cost a premium so that would not be fair...that said...you should not be able to sell the based item as 100% T1...if someone want wants 100% T1 they should pay Udimi’s premium.
I would not filter. Some of us use only use tier 1 data to build our list. It cost a premium so that would not be fair...that said...you should not be able to sell the based item as 100% T1...if someone want wants 100% T1 they should pay Udimi’s premium.
”
That's exactly the point.Since everyone is offering 100% T1 on base price,the premium,t1 filter has become pretty much usless
That's exactly the point.Since everyone is offering 100% T1 on base price,the premium,t1 filter has become pretty much usless
I would not filter. Some of us use only use tier 1 data to build our list. It cost a premium so that would not be fair...that said...you should not be able to sell the based item as 100% T1...if someone want wants 100% T1 they should pay Udimi’s premium.
”
Yeah that is what I am suggesting. Right now most sellers in this industry send 90%+ tier 1 on base orders, so ordering 100% tier 1 is not necessary. I would like to have that changed, so there actually is an incentive again to order 100% tier 1.
Yeah that is what I am suggesting. Right now most sellers in this industry send 90%+ tier 1 on base orders, so ordering 100% tier 1 is not necessary. I would like to have that changed, so there actually is an incentive again to order 100% tier 1.
Maybe I didn't explain it clear enough. Let's say I am a buyer and purchase traffic from seller xyz. I know that seller xyz will send me 90%+ tier 1 on my base price, so why should I pay more for 100% tier 1? It's only a small difference between 90% and 100% tier.
Therefore my suggestion is to set a maximum tier 1 rate of 80% for the base price orders. This way me as a buyer will probably purchase premium with 100% tier 1, as I now know that my maximum tier 1 rate on normal orders will be 80%.
I hope I made the point clear :-)
Maybe I didn't explain it clear enough. Let's say I am a buyer and purchase traffic from seller xyz. I know that seller xyz will send me 90%+ tier 1 on my base price, so why should I pay more for 100% tier 1? It's only a small difference between 90% and 100% tier.
Therefore my suggestion is to set a maximum tier 1 rate of 80% for the base price orders. This way me as a buyer will probably purchase premium with 100% tier 1, as I now know that my maximum tier 1 rate on normal orders will be 80%.
Yeah that is what I am suggesting. Right now most sellers in this industry send 90%+ tier 1 on base orders, so ordering 100% tier 1 is not necessary. I would like to have that changed, so there actually is an incentive again to order 100% tier 1.
I think 80% is too low, a T1 filter is 10% extra, I usually average my orders around 90% T1, which means if you want 10% more T1, you pay ~10% more. So 85 to 90% sounds more reasonable for that to me.
I think 80% is too low, a T1 filter is 10% extra, I usually average my orders around 90% T1, which means if you want 10% more T1, you pay ~10% more. So 85 to 90% sounds more reasonable for that to me.
Yes 100% T1 option is rarely nowadays because most sellers have high t1... But enforcing 80% max will not work and will be unfair to some sellers that have a high T1 list as their over 80% t1 is going to be filtered.
ex: my lists are almost 97% T1 on average so i have no choice but to send high T1, how am i going to fill the 20% none T1 gap? therefore this wont work.
on the other hand, enforcing a 80% min on orders is a much better idea (part of the Base Filter), means better traffic and less filtering and less crap traffic going through udimi.
Cheers
Hey Daniel,
Yes 100% T1 option is rarely nowadays because most sellers have high t1... But enforcing 80% max will not work and will be unfair to some sellers that have a high T1 list as their over 80% t1 is going to be filtered.
ex: my lists are almost 97% T1 on average so i have no choice but to send high T1, how am i going to fill the 20% none T1 gap? therefore this wont work.
on the other hand, enforcing a 80% min on orders is a much better idea (part of the Base Filter), means better traffic and less filtering and less crap traffic going through udimi.
Hi all,
I just thought about how the tier 1 rate evolved over the years. I remember times a few years ago when non 100% tier 1 orders had like 70% tier 1. Nowadays people are sending like 90%+ tier 1 on those orders. To be honest with this tier 1 rate it isn't really an incentive for buyers to purchase 100% tier 1, as they receive 90%+ anyways.
So my suggestion would be to set a maximum tier 1 percentage of 80% on non 100% tier 1 orders. Everything above 80% should get filtered.
This gives buyers actually an incentive to buy 100% tier 1.
What do you guys think?
I just thought about how the tier 1 rate evolved over the years. I remember times a few years ago when non 100% tier 1 orders had like 70% tier 1. Nowadays people are sending like 90%+ tier 1 on those orders. To be honest with this tier 1 rate it isn't really an incentive for buyers to purchase 100% tier 1, as they receive 90%+ anyways.
So my suggestion would be to set a maximum tier 1 percentage of 80% on non 100% tier 1 orders. Everything above 80% should get filtered.
This gives buyers actually an incentive to buy 100% tier 1.
What do you guys think?
Hot New Traffic Available With Hungry Buyers - MMO, Crypto, Bizopp
I would not filter. Some of us use only use tier 1 data to build our list. It cost a premium so that would not be fair...that said...you should not be able to sell the based item as 100% T1...if someone want wants 100% T1 they should pay Udimi’s premium.
I like this idea and support it.
"This guy provides quality leads. Got sales on the first day" - Kevin Allen
That's exactly the point.Since everyone is offering 100% T1 on base price,the premium,t1 filter has become pretty much usless
"This guy provides quality leads. Got sales on the first day" - Kevin Allen
Yeah that is what I am suggesting. Right now most sellers in this industry send 90%+ tier 1 on base orders, so ordering 100% tier 1 is not necessary. I would like to have that changed, so there actually is an incentive again to order 100% tier 1.
Hot New Traffic Available With Hungry Buyers - MMO, Crypto, Bizopp
Maybe I didn't explain it clear enough. Let's say I am a buyer and purchase traffic from seller xyz. I know that seller xyz will send me 90%+ tier 1 on my base price, so why should I pay more for 100% tier 1? It's only a small difference between 90% and 100% tier.
Therefore my suggestion is to set a maximum tier 1 rate of 80% for the base price orders. This way me as a buyer will probably purchase premium with 100% tier 1, as I now know that my maximum tier 1 rate on normal orders will be 80%.
I hope I made the point clear :-)
Therefore my suggestion is to set a maximum tier 1 rate of 80% for the base price orders. This way me as a buyer will probably purchase premium with 100% tier 1, as I now know that my maximum tier 1 rate on normal orders will be 80%.
I hope I made the point clear :-)
Hot New Traffic Available With Hungry Buyers - MMO, Crypto, Bizopp
Okay that makes sense to me and I support
I think 80% is too low, a T1 filter is 10% extra, I usually average my orders around 90% T1, which means if you want 10% more T1, you pay ~10% more. So 85 to 90% sounds more reasonable for that to me.
Top Sales Rated Verified Vendor | Buyers Included
Hey Daniel,
Yes 100% T1 option is rarely nowadays because most sellers have high t1... But enforcing 80% max will not work and will be unfair to some sellers that have a high T1 list as their over 80% t1 is going to be filtered.
ex: my lists are almost 97% T1 on average so i have no choice but to send high T1, how am i going to fill the 20% none T1 gap? therefore this wont work.
on the other hand, enforcing a 80% min on orders is a much better idea (part of the Base Filter), means better traffic and less filtering and less crap traffic going through udimi.
Cheers
Yes 100% T1 option is rarely nowadays because most sellers have high t1... But enforcing 80% max will not work and will be unfair to some sellers that have a high T1 list as their over 80% t1 is going to be filtered.
ex: my lists are almost 97% T1 on average so i have no choice but to send high T1, how am i going to fill the 20% none T1 gap? therefore this wont work.
on the other hand, enforcing a 80% min on orders is a much better idea (part of the Base Filter), means better traffic and less filtering and less crap traffic going through udimi.
Cheers
Targeted Solo Ads Traffic That Works! Top Seller Since 2014